|
LyteInc
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/6/2010 5:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f-dallas
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/7/2010 9:27 AM
|
|
|
|
That should be that, provided his presence in a club didn't violate his probation (which could lead to a mandatory suspension of some kind).
|
|
|
|
|
munchdaddy
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/12/2010 1:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Ok,
Who the hell sends their kid to a football camp with Michael Vick in the first place?
|
|
|
|
|
bassiladelph
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/12/2010 1:30 PM
|
|
|
|
Cat lovers
|
|
|
|
|
section 371
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/13/2010 7:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Eagles continue to insist that Vick is safe
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/07/12/eagles-continue-to-insist-that-vick-is-safe/
SO..... IS IT SAFE?
link
|
|
|
|
|
LyteInc
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/13/2010 8:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Section, remember that old boy saying "No means yes"? Well the Eagles FO took that to heart a bit too seriously. That they are adamant about it just tells me they are shopping him, but are having problems with location (has to stay in PA at least for now), and Pitt really can't bark up that shitstorm.
|
|
|
|
|
section 371
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/13/2010 9:30 PM
|
|
|
|
LyteInc
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
Reply
7/13/2010 8:44 PM
Section, remember that old boy saying "No means yes"?
Lyte
I'd say it's more of the Eagles FO saying we were wro wroo wroong, ala Arthur Herbert Fonzarelli ....
Their stupid pride bites em in the azz again.
|
|
|
|
|
bassiladelph
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/15/2010 9:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Vick's creditors going after his family and loved ones who got money from him before he filed for Chapter 11:
link
|
|
|
|
|
uber1024
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/16/2010 10:30 AM
|
|
|
|
Eagles continue to insist that Vick is safe
They also said that McNabb's job as starting quarterback was safe.
|
|
|
|
|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/25/2010 10:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bassiladelph
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/26/2010 9:32 AM
|
|
|
|
What, you thought giving his money away to relatives and friends before the creditors came calling was it?
That's just broadening the scope of what happened before his lockup. I doubt the Eagles do anything about that.
|
|
|
|
|
bassiladelph
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/26/2010 1:18 PM
|
|
|
|
Besides, Vick has been cleared to play.
click here
|
|
|
|
|
BMA
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/27/2010 8:56 AM
|
|
|
|
Much ado about nothing, as it was from the very beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
uber1024
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/27/2010 9:05 AM
|
|
|
|
Much ado about nothing, as it was from the very beginning.
Convicted felons, parole violation, a shooting, and a cover-up. Nothing to see here.
|
|
|
|
|
BMA
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/27/2010 9:17 AM
|
|
|
|
Please. You thought the guy was shot and killed, good job being the lead person from the overreaction crowd.
|
|
|
|
|
uber1024
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/27/2010 3:00 PM
|
|
|
|
I forgot that you ALWAYS know what the fuck you're talking about, Captain LULZ FAIL WATCHME OVERREACT.
Seriously, don't have kids.
|
|
|
|
|
LyteInc
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
7/27/2010 3:09 PM
|
|
|
|
Uber as long as Rush doesn't tell him to have kids, BMA will be childless.
|
|
|
|
|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Vick NOT involved in recent dog shooting
|
|
Reply
|
|
8/19/2010 9:48 PM
|
|
|
|
chopstick up you pee hole
|
|
|
|
|
|