
|
KeithByars
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/1/2009 9:36 AM
|

|

|
|
|

|

|
funky49
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/2/2009 4:47 PM
|

|

|

|
Bye weeks suck
|

|
|

|

|
Jules_Jr
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/3/2009 9:09 PM
|

|

|

|
Kinda, but I'm looking forward to the Steelers Chargers, Pats-Ravens, Jets-Saints, and (I admit) Vikes-Packers.
I probably will make no effort to watch it but I'll keep an eye on the Boys-Broncos.
Some good matchups this weekend.
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/3/2009 9:55 PM
|

|

|

|
The Boys are frauds. Could be that Denver's a fraud as well, but I can easily see Denver winning. Plus Dallas is on the road after escaping yet another home loss.
|

|
|

|

|
fågelpojke
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 3:38 AM
|

|

|

|
I don't think the Pokes are frauds. They're a decent/good team that will give the Eagles fits. I'm not saying they'll win the SB or even the Division, but they are a threat.
|

|
|

|

|
SeeZakRun
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 3:57 PM
|

|

|

|
The Redskins might be the worst 2-2 team in NFL history.
|

|
|

|

|
section 371
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 4:48 PM
|

|

|

|
If you look at the Foreskins schedule they play 5 of the worse teams in the NFL from week 2-6.
They could very easily be 4-2 before the Eagles game on the 26th.
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 5:00 PM
|

|

|

|
Cincinnati has now been involved in the last 2 NFL ties, one against the worst team in the league.
*facepalm*
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 5:02 PM
|

|

|

|
OK, so no tie, and Cincinnati wins at the last second.
Thanks CBS.
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 5:06 PM
|

|

|

|
And who would've thought Tennessee would be 0-4? They're done.
And who would've thought the Saints would be winning with DEFENSE?
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 5:19 PM
|

|

|

|
Crazy games today. I can't believe the Titans are 0-4 and were blown out by an average Jags team, to boot.
NFL Redzone is simply amazing, by the way. The NFL Network sucks, but this Redzone channel rules.
|

|
|

|

|
NotoriousEAG
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 5:36 PM
|

|

|

|
No need to ever go to a bar on Sunday with that Red Zone channel.
Simply incredible
|

|
|

|

|
TheTalon
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 6:02 PM
|

|

|

|
I guess you guys weren't able to see New England-Baltimore. It was a great game with a few bizarre calls, including Harbaugh's challenge of a play that had an illegal motion call on New England. The Pats were facing 4th-and-8, and they pulled a fast one, going for a quick fake FG and pass that looked close to the first down. However, it was correctly ruled that the receiver was never set, so an illegal motion penalty forced NE to go for the FG. Harbaugh then challenged, thinking that the pass didn't make a first down (even though it seemed pretty obvious to me that he made it). However, I don't get how Harbaugh could even challenge the play because it would have been automatically been ruled dead from the illegal motion penalty. (Not surprisingly, shit-for-brains Phil Sims didn't even acknowledge this.) The refs actually ruled that the receiver got a first down but the illegal motion penalty negated that. Phil Sims applauded the challenge anyway. Am I missing something here?
Towards the end of the game, Baltimore put together a nice drive and was getting very close to the end zone, trailing by 6 with less than 40 seconds remaining. They had a 4th-and-short from about the 20, and Mark Clayton made a Pinkstonesque drop when the ball hit him in the chest. It looked all too familiar. I'm sure Harbaugh had plenty of bad flashbacks there.
|

|
|

|

|
section 371
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 6:13 PM
|

|

|

|
Buckhalter looks good.
Romo stinks on ice.
|

|
|

|

|
Jules_Jr
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 6:37 PM
|

|

|

|
Talon, I watched the game too. Great game. Flacco is for real. I thought the same thing at the end of the game, except I remembered Kevin Curtis dropping the first down instead of Pinky. Flacco had three good throws in that last series, a tough but catchable TD, a good throw but nice defense and then Kevin Curtis/Pinky.
|

|
|

|

|
TheTalon
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 7:21 PM
|

|

|

|
Gotta love that Denver-Dallas ending.
|

|
|

|

|
section 371
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 7:35 PM
|

|

|

|
Date placed:
Oct 04, 2009 3:19p
Date settled:
Oct 04, 2009 7:20p
4 Team Parlay
Football - NFL Lines (Game) Point Spread
(218) New Orleans Saints -7½ (-115) Sun@4:05p
Final Scores
New York Jets 10
New Orleans Saints 24
Football - NFL Lines (Game) Point Spread
(220) Miami Dolphins Pick Sun@4:05p
Final Scores
Buffalo Bills 10
Miami Dolphins 38
Football - NFL Lines (Game) Point Spread
(222) San Francisco 49ers -10 (-105) Sun@4:15p
Final Scores
St. Louis Rams 0
San Francisco 49ers 35
Football - NFL Lines (Game) Point Spread
(224) Denver Broncos +3 (-105) Sun@4:15p
Final Scores
Dallas Cowboys 10
Denver Broncos 17
Outcome: Win
Risk US$ 3.00 to win US$ 37.81
Yes the Broncos game was icing on the cake.
|

|
|

|

|
section 371
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 7:37 PM
|

|

|

|
Date placed:
Oct 03, 2009 6:07p
Date settled:
Oct 03, 2009 11:28p
4 Team Parlay
Football - College Lines (Game) Point Spread
(179) Ohio State -18 Sat@7:00p
Final Scores
Ohio State 33
Indiana 14
Football - College Lines (Game) Point Spread
(185) Auburn +2½ Sat@7:45p
Final Scores
Auburn 26
Tennessee 22
Football - College Lines (Game) Point Spread
(152) Miami (Florida) +7½ Sat@8:00p
Final Scores
Oklahoma 20
Miami (Florida) 21
Football - College Lines (Game) Point Spread
(187) USC -5 Sat@8:00p
Final Scores
USC 30
California 3
Outcome: Win
Risk US$ 5.92 to win US$ 71.04
This one was a little better though.
|

|
|

|

|
section 371
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 8:04 PM
|

|

|

|
What do Rich Gannon and Supah 5 have in common? link
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 8:48 PM
|

|

|

|
That Denver/Dallas ending was awesome, and Romo was thisclose to the media being back on his stuff if they would've pulled out the win.
Rex Ryan's team limited Brees, but playing the Saints in New Orleans? If they get HFA, they are going to be tough to beat. Looking forward to those Atl/NO showdowns. And the Jets are actually good.
Does anyone know what's wrong with Tennessee? Aside from running the table, they're done (three of their next four: Indy, @NE, @SF after the bye). Tall, tall order.
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 10:06 PM
|

|

|

|
Rodney Harrison: 'Tom Brady, take off the skirt and put on some slacks and play football'.
Wow.
|

|
|

|

|
Jules_Jr
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 11:27 PM
|

|

|

|
Maybe Rodney forgot to send him his HGH?
|

|
|

|

|
Jules_Jr
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 11:31 PM
|

|

|

|
PS, some of those roughing the passer calls on Brady were seriously weak.
|

|
|

|

|
I Hate Shaun Young
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/4/2009 11:41 PM
|

|

|

|
I can't believe the Steelers almost blew that one.
And did anyone else think Shayne Graham's game-winner looked wide?
|

|
|

|

|
TheTalon
RE: General NFL Discussion Thread
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/5/2009 12:26 AM
|

|

|

|
Totally thought that field goal was wide. Everyone in the bar thought the same. We were all saying, "Holy shit! Another tie for the Bengals," and then they called it good.
|

|
|

|
|
|